What do you want for DLC?

22 hours ago, Doomguy-1993 said:

Under that logic I guess Plutonia and Evilution should have been in Doom 2 day 1.

Man I miss the 90's/early 2000's when people were actually excited to get expansion packs, now they see more content as a bad thing.

Because DLC nowadays is just a way to milk money from gamers.

Just now, MassiveEdgelord said:

Because DLC nowadays is just a way to milk money from gamers.

true, dlc is not the same as the expansions we used to get. hopefully the single player expansions are fleshed out, i dont mind waiting a year for something substantial. 

Honestly just more story, preferably explaining more things that happened between 2016 and Eternal rather than post-campaign mini-sequel, I think there's plenty material to work with.

11 hours ago, MassiveEdgelord said:

Because DLC nowadays is just a way to milk money from gamers.

In my experience that depends on the developer/publisher. Some of them still make what would have been expansion packs back in the day.

11 hours ago, MassiveEdgelord said:

Because DLC nowadays is just a way to milk money from gamers.

Then don't buy it. 

The more DLC the better.

4 minutes ago, Zemini said:

The more DLC the better.

If it barely adds anything new to the game... honestly I think we'd all be better without the said DLC.

2 hours ago, seed said:

 

If it barely adds anything new to the game... honestly I think we'd all be better without the said DLC.

Something is always better than nothing.  So you will have to provide a example when something small completely destroys your fun.

19 minutes ago, Zemini said:

Something is always better than nothing.  So you will have to provide a example when something small completely destroys your fun.

How about a new gun that is weak even with upgrades, or new enemies that also suck. And of course, there's always more cosmetics, so how about more Slayer skins, all for a ludicrous price of 20$.

This example is supposed to be slightly exaggerated, just so I get my point across. And gee, rather than having shitty DLC I'd rather have nothing :v .

26 minutes ago, seed said:

 

How about a new gun that is weak even with upgrades, or new enemies that also suck. And of course, there's always more cosmetics, so how about more Slayer skins, all for a ludicrous price of 20$.

 

This example is supposed to be slightly exaggerated, just so I get my point across. And gee, rather than having shitty DLC I'd rather have nothing :v .

And how do you know the DLC will be like this?

It is time for devs to give up and give a beach DLC. Those demons are going to look better than ever.

17 minutes ago, oCrapaCreeper said:

And how do you know the DLC will be like this?

I was hypothetically speaking, in a response to the statement that "anything is always better than nothing". No, it really isn't.

And of course the DLC will not be like that.

1 hour ago, seed said:

 

How about a new gun that is weak even with upgrades, or new enemies that also suck. And of course, there's always more cosmetics, so how about more Slayer skins, all for a ludicrous price of 20$.

 

This example is supposed to be slightly exaggerated, just so I get my point across. And gee, rather than having shitty DLC I'd rather have nothing :v .

Can't control shitty content but I am willing to risk it.  Besides a lot of your examples are subjective anyways.  People are calling for the Marauders to be removed because they think they "suck" but I find them fun to fight.  I also can't stand the stupid fortnite skins but here we are and I chose not to buy it.

15 hours ago, MassiveEdgelord said:

Because DLC nowadays is just a way to milk money from gamers.

Well, yeah, but making games isn't free, least of all at this level of quality and fidelity. Don't you feel like you got your money's worth from Eternal already? I've had 20 something hours of quality entertainment already, strikes me as reasonable to charge me for more if what they cook up seems to deserve it.

13 minutes ago, oCrapaCreeper said:

And how do you know the DLC will be like this?

We don't. But it's been done before, by a Bethesda-published game too: https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/events/horse-armor

more multiplayer game modes (especially the invasion mode they harped on and on about early in the game's development) and more demons to play as in them. the starting roster is fine so far, but it's just my luck that aside from the marauder, they picked my least favorite demons in the doom franchise XD

1 hour ago, holaareola said:

...strikes me as reasonable to charge me for more if what they cook up seems to deserve it.

i’d pay 20 bucks for something substantial. 

Play as Samuel Hayden with his own boosted abilities and a couple unique weapons. In this DLC we learn of his actions just after Doom 2016 and how he ended up in the state Doom Slayer sees him.

16 minutes ago, Chezza said:

Play as Samuel Hayden with his own boosted abilities and a couple unique weapons. In this DLC we learn of his actions just after Doom 2016 and how he ended up in the state Doom Slayer sees him.

Or play as the marauder (before he was turned into a demon) and show what happend between him and the Doom guy

On 4/2/2020 at 2:29 AM, seed said:

rather than having shitty DLC I'd rather have nothing :v .

You can have nothing though... by not buying the DLC

I used to rag on DLC but then i played the DLC for Dark Souls 1 and 3 , Borderlands 2, and Far Cry 3 and it really changed my mind.

there are good and bad DLC just like there are Good and Bad Expansions.

12 minutes ago, jazzmaster9 said:

You can have nothing though... by not buying the DLC

 

I used to rag on DLC but then i played the DLC for Dark Souls 1 and 3 , Borderlands 2, and Far Cry 3 and it really changed my mind.

there are good and bad DLC just like there are Good and Bad Expansions.

Easier said than done, what is the standard edition gets replaced once all DLCs are out, and you didn't buy it back then, and now you have no choice? :p

Yeah, whatever, I never said we can't just ignore it, but I think I've made my point clear already, so there's no point in continuing this discussion.

I want an update that let's us use the demon skins in single player!

Seriously those skins look rad and it's a bummer they're stuck in multiplayer.

On 4/2/2020 at 1:07 PM, MadGuy said:

Or play as the marauder (before he was turned into a demon) and show what happend between him and the Doom guy

What about play as the betrayer?

More Slayer Gates, and possibly more castle levels. 

On 4/2/2020 at 5:51 AM, Chezza said:

Play as Samuel Hayden with his own boosted abilities and a couple unique weapons. In this DLC we learn of his actions just after Doom 2016 and how he ended up in the state Doom Slayer sees him.

I dunno, the promo images of him leading ARC with a crucible blade tells just enough about how he ended up like that.

On 4/2/2020 at 6:07 PM, MadGuy said:

Or play as the marauder (before he was turned into a demon) and show what happend between him and the Doom guy

There are more than one Marauder though.

Deathmatch (maybe with some classic maps remastered), Daisy added to DG's room, more music, more story (maybe DG calls up his cousin, Stan), the battle of Argent D'Nur, and the story of how DG found the Fortress of Doom. T

Oh yeah, and crossplay, because I seem to be the only person who bought the game on Stadia.

There are a few story things I'd like to see probably

Main two being:

A mission set during the time of The Night Sentinels

and a mission set right after Doom 2016 explaining how the Slayer got back out of hell and found the Fortress of Doom.

New environments/locations and new enemies are what I'm looking forward to most. Don't care about story connections.

Might need to do a DE Prologue/D16 Epiligoe to fill in some of the holes.  There is no doubt that the story retconned some stuff and complicated things a bit more than it needed to be.

I want TNT and Plutonia based classic levels. Like a revamped version of what we got in 2016 but better.