RoastDoom Posted April 29 The fandom wiki has a horrendous UI in general. Not a fan! 0 Share this post Link to post
.zwxn Posted April 29 On the note of Fandom being absolute garbage, I'm leaving this here, as I've been using it for quite some time now and find it pretty useful. 0 Share this post Link to post
TF_Doomer Posted April 30 20 hours ago, Gez said: Even worse, some games already had an existing independent wiki but Wikia had to go and make their own copy anyway. For example the UESP has existed as a wiki since March 2005 (and had a long history as a static site before that), Wikia created their copycat Elder Scrolls wiki in June 2006. Really? I mean I’m not surprised since it’s a greedy corporation that pays some search engines so it can show up higher in results cause with all that hate how does it still have enough people actively searching it. But wowwww that’s just a sad display. 0 Share this post Link to post
wallabra Posted May 24 (edited) On 4/26/2024 at 11:40 AM, Kinsie said: In addition, due to Fandom's weird under-the-table dealings [...] Would this be "SEO"? (A fancy term for filling your site's metadata with keywords to make it appear higher in search results.) 0 Share this post Link to post
Maximum Matt Posted May 24 Is it okay to admit that I wrote a few walkthroughs for some Plutonia levels on the site back in the day? 0 Share this post Link to post
VICE Posted May 24 14 minutes ago, Maximum Matt said: Is it okay to admit that I wrote a few walkthroughs for some Plutonia levels on the site back in the day? Depends. Can you survive the hitsquad now converging on your location? 3 Share this post Link to post
Redneckerz Posted May 24 3 hours ago, Maximum Matt said: Is it okay to admit that I wrote a few walkthroughs for some Plutonia levels on the site back in the day? Doomworld community: 2 Share this post Link to post